Question:
Do you believe, along with the Gnostics, that Sophia is fallen and in
need of redemption? Why or why not?
I
am horrified by the Gnostic myth that Sophia is "fallen"
and in need of redemption. Not because to make mistakes and need help
is outwith my understanding – quite the opposite! - but because it
is yet another example of a woman, albeit one who represents the
Wisdom of God, being blamed for our human situation of partial
separation from the Divine Being. I really don't like the blame
culture which both this, and the story interpreted as 'The Fall', are
a part. Both Eve and Sophia have suffered from ultimate misogyny.
It
seems to me that the interpretation of the story of 'the Fall' in
Genesis make more sense, as has been suggested by some scholars such
as Richard Smoley, when understood in terms of a choice Adam and Eve
made – the choice to seek out knowledge and to learn to discern
good and evil. They got what they wanted, although the life it
entailed/entails is not an easy one: it's not a rose garden here!
Similarly,
the role of Sophia was a positive one: rather than having fallen from
grace, my view would be that Sophia chose to 'fall' into matter and
become manifest, as Caitlin Matthews says (in her fascinating book
'Sophia: Goddess of Wisdom' which I have just begun reading) 'in
every atom, permeating all things like the sparks that run through
charcoal.' This, of course, also means that Sophia also resides in
all of us, that she is the 'divine spark' which dwells within us.
Sophia's choice and its consequences make Sophia knowable and
accessible, not least to those outwith the theological framework of
belief in Jesus as the Incarnation of God.
(This
is probably a complete irrelevance, but it occurs to me that in the
book & film 'Sophie's Choice', the choice the eponymous Sophie
made was to sacrifice her daughter Eva ('life') for the sake of her
son Jan (derived from the name Johanan which means 'YHWH is
gracious')
By
her motherly love Sophia, he Wisdom of God, is also an inspiration
both toward similar compassion to our selves and to others, and of
the impulse to return to our Creator, the ultimate Divine Being, not
through rejecting the material world, but through understanding and
knowledge of the God who is within all and is all.
In
terms of the so-called 'problem of evil' (and of suffering) which the
stories of the 'falls' of Eve and Sophia claim to address: it seems
to me to be unreasonable to blame anything outside of our selves for
the existence of these. Fear, the unreasonable fear of difference,
separates us from one another, such that we fail to see that the harm
we inflict on one another is actually harming us all, including our
selves. It is humans whose evil creates suffering, not God, and until
we begin to open ourselves to one another, accept our commonality,
and live in fellowship, then evil and suffering will persist.
As
Robert Burns wrote:
Many
and sharp the num'rous ills inwoven with our frame.
More
pointed still we make ourselves, regret, remorse, and shame.
And
man, whose heav'n-erected face the smiles of love adorn, -
Man's
inhumanity to man makes countless thousands mourn
(Man
was Made to Mourn. 1784)
I
believe that God mourns with and for us, and wants our inhumanity to
end, so we become fully human as we are created to be, with all the
capacities that that includes.
No comments:
Post a Comment